Decision intelligence, not another dashboard.
Axionia combines independent benchmarking, transparent scenario modeling, and AI-native research agents into one methodology — built to serve HR leaders and CFOs at the same time, with the same numbers.
Don’t take our word for it. Turn the dials yourself.
This is a working version of what you receive — set it to your own headcount and workforce profile, then move the assumptions and watch every number respond. Nothing is hidden behind a login.
20% of claimed value double-counted
Baseline. The portfolio as we first scored it.
Eight dimensions scored independently, plotted against the peer median for light manufacturing employers of comparable size (dashed outline). Your weakest axes are where recoverable dollars usually sit.
This one is a composite. Yours wouldn’t be.
The free report runs this same analysis on your actual programs and workforce — reviewed by a human before it reaches you.
Everything above responds to your inputs, and the arithmetic is the arithmetic we use. The category baseline, peer set and program benchmarks behind it are illustrative — your report is modeled on your own programs and workforce.
The dials above are the model. A real report is thirty pages of it — seven programs taken apart, $5.02M of claimed savings walked down to $2.16M, and every assumption behind the walk written out where you can argue with it.
Tell us what you’re optimising for. We’ll show our work either way.
An employer buying to hold margin and an employer buying to win a hiring market are not making the same decision, even when they’re looking at the same program. So the first thing we ask is what this portfolio is for — and the answer changes the recommendation, not the evidence.
Measurable in dollars, and the only family where we'll put a point estimate on the outcome.
Directionally scored, never assigned a dollar value — too confounded by pay, management and the labour market to attribute honestly.
Scored on breadth and evidence quality, against your covered population rather than a national base.
Where a portfolio is most often incomplete without anyone having decided it should be.
We don’t score the objective — only the evidence.
Whether equity, cost or retention should lead is a question about what your organisation is for, and it isn’t ours to answer. What we guarantee is that the weights are written down, visible in the output, and applied the same way whichever you choose. Two employers can receive opposite recommendations from identical analysis and both be right.
What weighting does not do
Weights change what gets recommended and in what order. They don’t put a dollar figure on a soft outcome. Retention, satisfaction and productivity stay directionally scored and openly labelled as such — they’re too confounded by pay, management and the labour market to attribute honestly, and a weighting slider is not a licence to pretend otherwise.
Start free. Go as deep as you need.
Score your portfolio
Run the free Portfolio Scorer to see where your benefits stand against comparable employers.
Get the full analysis
Structured intake feeds a scenario model and independent research — delivered as a report, not a sales call.
Bring it to the decision
Use the ranges and the exposed assumptions in the room, whether that's with your broker, your board, or your CFO.
Three phases, nine deliverables.
Set it up once, analyse it properly, then keep it current. The third phase is the one a report can’t do.
Set up
Your programs, carriers and renewal dates, the workforce you're actually buying for, and the vendor material you already have. Captured once and reused by everything after it.
Analyse
The portfolio scored on eight axes against comparable employers — that part is free. Then the vendor claims taken apart adjustment by adjustment, and the result modeled as a range rather than a number.
Steward
What changed this month, where the portfolio moved this quarter against a benchmark that moved too, and what the renewal cycle should look like next year.
On-premises deployment for strict data-residency or procurement requirements is an enterprise add-on — see pricing.
See it on a real decision.
Meridian Manufacturing’s broker just recommended a virtual MSK program at $180 PMPM in savings. Step through what Axionia found.
The vendor claim
Meridian Manufacturing — 820 employees, light manufacturing, Midwest. Their broker recommends SpineWell's virtual MSK program, claiming $180 PMPM in savings.
Illustrative example built from a composite employer profile — not a real client engagement.
Get this run on your actual portfolio.
The Portfolio Scorer is free and there’s no sales call attached to it. If it’s useful, the deeper analysis is there when you want it.